AFA Michigan.org. American Family Association of Michigan  
Home
About AFA Michigan
Media Center
Links
Contact AFA Michigan
Support AFA Michigan
AFAMI News

Search


STATE NEWS: AFA-MI President Speaks Against Lansing’s “Gay Rights” Proposal

November 21, 2006

STATE NEWS
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan - November 21, 2006

Lansing ordinance prompts protest
Gender identity, orientation clause focus of debate
By Alex Altman

Lansing — During the Transgender Day of Remembrance, some MSU conservatives protested the “sexual orientation” and “gender identification or expression” sections of an anti-discrimination ordinance put forth by the Lansing City Council on Monday night. Lansing city officials discussed the ordinance, which would prohibit the harassment of and discrimination against an individual based on 20 protected criteria including race, religion, ancestry, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation and gender identity.

Ten years ago, Lansing city officials tried to pass a similar anti-discrimination ordinance but were unsuccessful.
Several Lansing residents gave their opinions of the ordinance during the hearing. Despite protesting from MSU’s Young Americans for Freedom, almost everyone who spoke expressed support for the ordinance and commended the council for tackling diversity issues. Psychology junior Michelle Nickerson said she supported the ordinance because it allows everyone to be protected under the law. “It’s a really good proposal they’re putting in front of the community,” Nickerson said. “It’s important to be inclusive of all cultures and to allow them protection under the law.”

MSU Young Americans for Freedom, or YAF, joined students from Olivet College’s newly formed YAF chapter to protest the bill.
Kyle Bristow, MSU’s YAF chairman, said the ordinance wouldn’t be fair because it discriminates against people who don’t practice homosexual behavior. “The proposal gives special rights to some people but aren’t given to all people,” Bristow said. “All people should be treated equally under the law.”

(more…)

LANSING STATE JOURNAL: Lansing Residents Voice Opinions on “Gay Rights” Ordinance

November 21, 2006

LANSING STATE JOURNAL
Lansing, Michigan - November 21, 2006

Rights proposal draws a crowd
Passions intense as council hears from both sides
By Tom Lambert

Nearly 200 people packed Lansing’s City Council chambers Monday night to voice their opinions about the city’s controversial human rights proposal. People on both sides of the issue spoke passionately about the ramifications of the ordinance. The eight-member council is expected to pass it unanimously Dec. 11. The measure would, among other things, prohibit harassment and discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity and student and marital status. Robert Riley, 73, said he stood against the proposal because homosexuals were “sick people” who didn’t deserve “special treatment.”

“What they need is help from a psychiatrist,” said Riley of Lansing. “If this passes, I might have to move.”

Maggie Lowden, a junior at Holt High School, said she was for the ordinance as she pointed out the words of the Pledge of Allegiance. “It says ‘liberty and justice for all,’ ” she said. “If we want to change it, we should add the footnote ‘as long as we declare them acceptable.’” Some of the characteristics included in the proposal are protected under state and/or federal law; others are not.

Most in favor
The measure is similar to one passed by the City Council in 1996 that later was voted down by residents. On Monday, though, most residents spoke in favor of the ordinance. If the proposal passes this time around, people would report violations to the city’s Department of Human Relations and Community Services. The department then would try to mediate the situation if discrimination was found to have occurred.

(more…)

ACTION ALERT FOLLOW UP: Lansing Council “Inundated” by Opposition to “Gay” Ordinance

November 17, 2006

Dear AFA-Michigan supporter,

You’re already making a difference regarding Lansing’s proposed “gay rights” and cross-dressing ordinance, and now homosexual activists are responding in kind.

Please read the e-mail alert below from a homosexual activist group based in Lansing, whose new executive director is the former political director of the Oakland County Republican Party under former county party chair L. Brooks Patterson.

Then, if you haven’t done so already, please join the reported 300 or more other AFA-Michigan supporters who’ve e-mailed or called the Lansing City Council to urge them to defeat this radical proposal.

Cut and paste these e-mail addresses for all city council members:

SALLEN5511@aol.com; jeb1211@sbcglobal.net; jbauer@ci.lansing.mi.us; kdunbar@ci.lansing.mi.us; jeffries@ci.lansing.mi.us; TKaltenb@ci.lansing.mi.us; hleeman@ci.lansing.mi.us; rwilliam@ci.lansing.mi.us; cwood@ci.lansing.mi.us; cwood74053@aol.com; council@ci.lansing.mi.us

Lansing City Council phone number: 517-483-4177

Thanks again for your support!
Gary Signature
Gary Glenn, President
American Family Association of Michigan


MichiganEquality

Associated Press:

November 17, 2006

Dear AFA-Michigan supporter,

President John Quincy Adams said: “Duty is ours. Results are God’s.”

Please read the Associated Press below, and you’ll see President Adams’ observation has never been more true than it is right now.

Over the next two years, AFA-Michigan pledges to continue to do our duty and our part to stop liberal politicians from ramming their homosexual and pro-abortion agenda through Congress, the Legislature, or our local governments (see the news story below).

Please continue to stand with us to meet the challenges ahead, and we’ll trust God together for the results.

Gary Signature
Gary Glenn, President
American Family Association of Michigan


ASSOCIATED PRESS
New York, New York - November 17, 2006

Liberals aim to ram measures past Congress: Hate-crime legislation, reproductive and gay rights top wish list
Reproductive rights are high on the liberals’ wish list now that Democrats control both houses of Congress.

by Nati Harnik

NEW YORK - After years of playing defense, liberal advocacy groups see the Democrats’ takeover of Congress as a long-awaited chance to convert some of their goals into law. Their wish lists include workplace protections for gays, a broader hate-crimes law, and a multi-pronged push to reduce unplanned pregnancies.

A Republican president remains in the White House, armed with veto power, and Democratic control of the Senate is as slim as could be. Yet gay-rights, feminist and abortion-rights groups are nonetheless pleased by their brightest prospects for legislative victories since 1994.

“It’s exciting to get off the defensive,” said Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. She hopes the new Congress will stay away from debate on abortion restrictions and instead work on a bipartisan basis to curtail unintended pregnancies.

“Common sense” initiatives
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said “common sense” initiatives might include requiring health insurance companies to cover birth control, requiring that emergency contraception be available at hospitals for rape victims, and ensuring that sex education for young people includes accurate information about contraceptives.
The president of the largest national gay-rights group, Joe Solmonese of the Human Rights Campaign, said he has high hopes for two long-pending proposals that failed to get through the GOP-controlled Congress. One would outlaw employment discrimination against gays, lesbians and transgender people; another would include them among the groups protected in federal hate-crimes legislation.

Gay activists also would like to see Congress repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that prohibits gay members of the military from being open about their sexual orientation - but a push for this may come somewhere down the road. “Everyone remembers the fight President Clinton had when he made this his first major political issue in 1993,” said Aaron Belkin, director of a University of California, Santa Barbara think tank that studies gays and the military. “While opinion on letting gays serve has moved leaps and bounds since then, the new Democratic Congress is not likely to come out strongly on this one from the get-go,” Belkin said.

Solmonese indicated that leading gay-rights groups will be patient with the new Democratic leadership, not pushing to have their issues be at the very top of the 2007 agenda. “What we’ve got is a new and respectful Congress that’s open to our community, to learning the specifics of our issues,” he said. “To stress right now - ‘This is what we want and this is when we want it’ - would be premature.”

Women’s rights
Feminist groups such as the National Organization for Women were generally at odds with the GOP leadership in Congress and have welcomed the power switch, which will include Rep. Nancy Pelosi serving as the first female speaker of the House.
NOW President Kim Gandy said her organization’s legislative wish list includes adding gender to the existing federal hate-crimes law, tightening controls over silicone breast implants, and improving options for working mothers through enhanced family leave policies and child care options.

Some conservatives have expressed hope that - on abortion issues, at least - Democratic stances in Congress might be moderated by the election of several anti-abortion candidates. But other leaders on the right, such as Family Research Council president Tony Perkins, doubt these Democratic newcomers will sway policy.

“Instead, anticipate the fiercest assault of our time against abstinence, marriage, life, good judges, and religious freedom,” Perkins wrote this week in the National Review. “Pro-life Democrats are likely to be marginalized in positions where they have little influence.” Another conservative leader, the Rev. Louis Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition, asserted that the gay-rights bills likely to advance next year will infringe on the rights of those who condemn homosexuality.

“All Americans must be prepared to endure serious threats to their freedom of speech, their right to make employment decisions as business owners, and their religious freedom in the business world,” Sheldon said.

—-

Liberal’s Wish List

Some measures that liberal advocacy groups would like to see passed by the new, Democratic-controlled Congress.
Gay Rights

  • Prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. According to gay-rights groups, it is now legal in 34 states to fire someone based on their sexual orientation.
  • Add sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of categories covered by the federal hate-crimes law, which now covers crimes based on race, religion and national origin. About 14 percent of the 7,163 hate crimes reported nationwide in 2005 involved sexual orientation, according to the FBI.
  • Replace “don’t ask, don’t tell” - the military’s policy prohibiting openly gay people from serving - with a policy prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Email Alert

November 14, 2006

PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW IN LANSING

Urge Lansing City Council to reject
discriminatory “gay rights,”
cross-dressing ordinance

Dear AFA-Michigan supporter,

Please stand with us by contacting the Lansing City Council today to urge that council members defeat a discriminatory and dangerous ordinance granting special “rights” to individuals who engage in homosexual behavior or cross-dressing. The ordinance is scheduled for a public hearing this coming Monday, Nov. 20th.

1. Please click on the email addresses below to send a message to all members of the Lansing City Council, urging them to vote against the ordinance.

SALLEN5511@aol.com, jeb1211@sbcglobal.net, jbauer@ci.lansing.mi.us, kdunbar@ci.lansing.mi.us, jeffries@ci.lansing.mi.us, TKaltenb@ci.lansing.mi.us, hleeman@ci.lansing.mi.us, rwilliam@ci.lansing.mi.us, cwood@ci.lansing.mi.us, cwood74053@aol.com, council@ci.lansing.mi.us

2. Please call and/or fax the Lansing City Council to urge that the ordinance be defeated.

  • Phone: 517-483-4177
  • Fax: 517-483-7630

3. Please attend this Monday’s public hearing and testify against the proposed “rights” ordinance. You must fill out a speaker’s form at the meeting in order to testify:

7:00 p.m.
Monday, Nov. 20
City Council Chambers
10th Floor, City Hall
124 W. Michigan Ave.
Lansing


TALKING POINTS

1. Individuals who engage in homosexual behavior and cross-dressing already have all the same rights provided to all Americans by the Constitution and federal, state, and local law.

What homosexual activists demand under Lansing’s proposed “gay rights” ordinance are new and additional special “rights” based on special “protected class” status created by city law. Federal and state civil rights laws already protect all citizens against discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex, and religion, none of which evoke moral concern.

But federal and state civil rights laws do not define homosexual behavior or cross-dressing as the moral, social, or legal equivalents of race, creed, color, or sex as a basis for civil rights.

Thus, the proposed city ordinance’s references to race, creed, color, and sex have no legal effect, since federal and state civil rights law already address them. The only legal effect of the proposed Lansing city ordinance is the creation of new and special “protected class” status based on homosexual behavior or cross-dressing.

(more…)

Click here to visit Clean Hotels.com

Categories
Abortion
Eminent Domain
Homosexual Agenda
AFL-CIO
Public Health
In The News
Marriage
News Releases
Pornography
Public Schools and Universities
Religious Freedom
Religious Heritage

Click here to complain to the FCC